Superseding Indictment: The Boss (Trump) Told His Staff to Destroy Evidence (Over the Cliff Notes)

On Thursday, the DOJ filed a superseding indictment against Trump and a new co-conspirator listing multiple new charges including Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice by “attempting to delete security camera footage from The Mar-a-Lago Club to conceal the footage from the FBI and grand jury.” (I asked readers once what I should call my breakdown and

Superseding Indictment: The Boss (Trump) Told His Staff to Destroy Evidence (Over the Cliff Notes) Read More »

Trump’s 2024 Trial Schedule: It’s Time To Learn To Love Procedure and the Nuance of Law

As I’m sure you’ve heard by now, DOJ prosecutors have given Trump a letter telling him he is the target of the criminal investigation into the attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. (Trump’s lawyers confirmed this in court.) Trump also said he had a deadline (which has now passed) if he wanted to talk

Trump’s 2024 Trial Schedule: It’s Time To Learn To Love Procedure and the Nuance of Law Read More »

The Struggle for Control of American Media: Missouri v. Biden

Missouri v. Biden (the case seeking to limit the Biden administration’s contacts with social media platforms) is, at heart, a dispute about content moderation on social media. It’s also about whether right-wing conspiracy theories about Covid, vaccines, and the election should be allowed to spread unchecked and unchallenged. It also embraces the libertarian (and anarchist)

The Struggle for Control of American Media: Missouri v. Biden Read More »

The Washington Post “Bombshell” about Merrick Garland

You can read The Washington Post article free through my subscription by clicking here. The sources for the piece are DOJ insiders who disagree with Garland’s approach. The article, therefore, is slanted in favor of their view. What we learn is this: There are DOJ insiders who disagree with Merrick Garland’s approach, and FBI agents who “resisted” opening

The Washington Post “Bombshell” about Merrick Garland Read More »

Trump’s Second Indictment, Part III: Trump Confessed. Now let’s bust a few myths.

Part I: Trump’s Second Indictment (Over the Cliff Notes) is here. Part II: Trump has been indicted on federal criminal charges and his case was assigned to Aileen Cannon. Now what? is here. Welcome to Part III. *  *  * After Trump’s arraignment, he gave a speech in which he said, “Under the Presidential Records

Trump’s Second Indictment, Part III: Trump Confessed. Now let’s bust a few myths. Read More »

Trump has been indicted on federal criminal charges and his case was assigned to Aileen Cannon. Now what?

No surprise, this weekend, Trump vowed to stay in the race, even if convicted. “I’ll never leave,” he told Politico. I have said that Trump’s political needs are at odds with his needs as a criminal defendant: Trump can either behave like a normal defendant or he can try to be a right-wing hero and

Trump has been indicted on federal criminal charges and his case was assigned to Aileen Cannon. Now what? Read More »

Donald Trump Borrows Timothy McVeigh’s “Defense”

The Rise of American Right-Wing Extremism From Timothy McVeigh to Stewart Rhodes “I am a political prisoner,” said Oath Keeper and January 6 insurrectionist Stewart Rhodes during his sentencing hearing, “and like President Trump, my only crime is opposing those who are destroying our country.” Rhodes vowed to continue to “expose the criminality of the regime”

Donald Trump Borrows Timothy McVeigh’s “Defense” Read More »

Trump was Found Liable for Sexual Abuse and Defamation — and He’s Appealing. Now what?

Trump scored a major loss when a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation and ordered him to pay $5 million to E. Jean Carroll for damages. He then filed a notice of appeal. Naturally, people want to know what this means and what to expect. (And no, the double meaning of “he’s

Trump was Found Liable for Sexual Abuse and Defamation — and He’s Appealing. Now what? Read More »

Rape is a Means of Asserting Patriarchal Power (a history of rape laws)

Throughout most of our history, rape was a property crime. An unmarried girl was her father’s property. A married woman was her husband’s property. If a virgin was raped, the property damage was to her father. If she was married, the damage was to her husband. If she wasn’t a virgin and wasn’t married, there

Rape is a Means of Asserting Patriarchal Power (a history of rape laws) Read More »

Scroll to Top