I. The GOP-Trump-FOX-Russia Love Affair
Here’s a timeline:
2013: Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation.
2014: Pat Buchanan noted that Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today” and stamping out western evil like easy divorce and homosexuality.
This is from Buchanan’s piece:
It should have occurred to Trump that a man in the Soviet Union hadn’t come by $6 million in cash legally—but he asked no questions. He permitted anonymous buyers to purchase his condos, so he was a magnet for dirty money. He personally attended the closing of Mogilevich’s condos.
During the Soviet regime, the government owned all resources and industries. When the Soviet Union broke up, the Russian Federation was established as a constitutional republic with a president and parliament chosen by free elections. But democracy never took hold. Before rule of law was in place, there was a wild rush to control the nation’s industries and resources. A few people became billionaires (by stealing what belonged to the people). Democracy never took hold. Leaders were picked by the new billionaires.
Thus Russia went from communism to oligarchy.
One of the new billionaires was Mogilevich, who was soon at the top of the Russian mafia and on the FBI’s Ten Top Most Wanted List (for a scam in Pennsylvania). As the oligarchs’ wealth grew (mostly through scams) they looked for ways to launder the money.
My source for the next section:
By the late 1990s, Trump was considered uncreditworthy and bankrupt. He owed $4 billion to more than 70 banks, and showed no inclination or capacity to repay the money.
Basically, Trump needed money and the Russian bandits had money they needed to launder. It was a match made in heaven. ❣️
Russians, through shell companies, bought his condos and propped him up. In 2002, after Trump went belly up in Atlantic City, he was bailed out by Bayrock, a real estate development company with ties to Mogilevich. Bayrock moved into Trump Tower. Felix Sater, a convicted Russian mobster and money launderer, was senior advisor to the Trump Org. and partnered with Bayrock.
Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev bought a house from Trump, paying $55 million more than Trump paid (a way to pump money to Trump).
In 2006 Russians financed building Trump SoHo & gave Trump 18% of the profits, though he did nothing.
“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” said Trump Jr.
April, 2013: The FBI arrested 29 men for running gambling rings in Trump Tower.
The Russian Agalarov family, who had longstanding ties to Trump, offered to help when Trump decided to run for President and initiated the famous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting. (Coincidence? Nah.)
III. The Authoritarian-Putin Love Affair
Political psychologists have defined the authoritarian personality.
Those with this disposition despise the weak and worship those they think are strong. They are averse to complexity (which includes diversity). They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.” They’re “simpleminded avoiders of complexity.”
For more see this article by Karen Stenner and Jon Haight and this article on right-wing authoritarianism.
Those with an authoritarian disposition have a “bias against different others (racial and ethnic outgroups, immigrants)
Karen Stenner’s research has led her to the conclusion that those with authoritarians dispositions make up about 1/3 of the population. This percentage occurs across cultures.
What all of this means is that Right-wing authoritarians positively worship someone like Putin, who has positioned himself as a strongman and the savior of the white race and Christianity.
IV. Authoritarianism is Part of our History
Lots of people are expressing amazement that anyone would admire Putin. Here’s a Republican:
People (particularly Republicans) who are surprised by the praise for Putin miss an important part of American history: Autocracy is deep in our history. A multi-racial democracy didn’t come to America until recently.
Slavery was autocratic. Jim Crow was autocratic. The GOP’s pushback against America transitioning to a true multi-racial democracy goes hand-in-hand with supporting a dictator like Putin. It’s perfectly consistent.
Putin stages elections in which the result is known beforehand. Members of the GOP were cool with fair elections when the choice was between two white men. Now . . . not so much.
In these books and elsewhere, Heather Cox Richardson explains that we’ve had two oligarchies and we’re slipping toward a third. The first was slavery when wealthy plantation owners—who were 1% of the population—controlled all three branches of government.
Next came the age of robber barons when industrialists had the power to exploit workers, manipulate markets, fix prices, grab women, and kill Black people who tried to vote. That’s the oligarchy the GOP wants to recreate. That’s what they mean by Make America great “again.”
It’s only relatively recently in our history that America has begun moving toward a true multi-racial democracy — and the backlash has been fierce. We’re still riding that backlash.
It also explains why so many Republicans praise Putin.
IV. Putin Bombs Ukraine; Republicans Try to Backpedal
At the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Republicans like Tucker Carlson praised Putin. Here is a recap of Carlson’s recent commentary on Putin and Ukraine:
- It’s “not un-American” to support Putin;
- Democrats will find you guilty of treason if you don’t hate Putin;
- The whole thing is simply a “border dispute”;
- “Ukraine is not a democracy”;
- Ukraine is a “puppet” of the West
(The above list is from this Vanity Fair article)
At a Mar-a-Lago event just before the invasion, Trump said, “Putin is smart. He’s taken over a country for $2 worth of sanctions. I’d say that’s pretty smart.”
Trump’s Secretary of State also praised Putin as “strong.”
Then, something happened. The Russians invaded Ukraine, but didn’t cruise to a quick and easy victory. Each day that the spunky Ukrainians, led by President Zelenskeyy, held out, world opinion hardened against Russia.
Putin’s allies in Eastern Europe including the most pro-Kremlin leaders, condemned Putin’s actions. Czech President Milos Zeman and Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban “didn’t mince words” as they condemned the attack. They might admire Putin and share his authoritarian instincts, but their nations suffered at the hands of the former Soviet Union, and they were obviously not interested in Putin trying to reassemble a Russian empire. It was also obvious that after Ukraine, they’d be next.
The West moved swiftly to impose sanctions.
Zelensky emerged as a hero. And . . . Republicans began jumping ship, starting with Sen. Ron Johnson condemned Putin’s attack on Ukraine.
Carlson did an about-face so fast you’d think he would have gotten whiplash. He said: “It’s a tragedy, because war always is a tragedy, and the closer you get to it, the more horrifying it seems. Vladimir Putin started this war, so whatever the context of the decision that he made, he did it. He fired the first shots. He is to blame for what we’re seeing tonight in Ukraine.”
Don’t let them jump ship. Don’t let anyone forget. Their pro-Putin position should be in political ads and should be the theme for the midterms.
Each and every Republican who enabled Trump and thus enabled Putin must go down with Putin’s ship.
V. The Good News
As of now, it looks like the Ukranians will not only stand up to Putin, but create a sea change in how the world treats Putin.
More good news: remember the doomsday stories about how, without new voting rights legislation, the Republicans would gerrymander their way to a majority in Congress (even though they are a minority of the population? Well, that fear came to nothing. As things stand now with the redistricting, Democrats are picking up 12 seats and may do even better.
VI. And Now, the Bad News
I have no words other than this: If the Ukrainians hold out and Putin is defeated but the Republicans gain control of the United States government, authoritarianism will remain entrenched.
It should be obvious that the problem is a political one: Here’s the thing about democracy. At any time, a majority can vote in candidates who promise to (and ultimately manage to) destroy democracy and replace it with something else.
The solution: each of us becoming a political activist to make sure the party that enabled Trump and Putin does not regain power in November. I’ve been signing up for shifts on a voter protection hotline. Texas is holding its primary on Tuesday, March 8 and I’ve been helping voters sort out their registration. What do you plan to do?